Years ago I read a very sexy story (I liked it) about a dolphin having sex with a female human. The dolphin pushed her into it. But it wasn’t aggressive, just persistant and then her own curiousity took her the rest of the way. (She didn’t leave or stop coming back). I don’t remember details but it was something about dolphins who had been kept for research.
I know we are all supposed to think human/ animal sex is bad. But, it was such a short time ago that other types of sex and sexuality were bad and I start to wonder… how far will it go? How long will it be before the media convinces people that sex with animals (and children) is acceptable. I’m not even typing a question mark there because I think it is likely.
Quite likely it will start with robot animals and children. After all, they aren’t real. So to use an inanimate object for your pleasure should be just fine, right? Not really different from using any common sex toy you could buy online.
Bypassing all the rules and regulations and ethics and all that political correctness we pretend to hold so highly…
Would sex with a robot animal turn you on? Would you watch or read about robot animals having sex or even forcing/ being forced into sexual situations?
No need to leave a comment. Just keep it to yourself. Be honest when no one’s looking.
To be clear for those who find this shocking – I’m not in favour of sex with real animals or children. No matter what the pedophiles say, it is not consensual when it involves a minor or other creature who can not clearly and completely communicate.
But, where does that leave robots… Something for your consideration.
Image source: Petsfoto.com
I like seeing photos of feral cats. They live wild and survive but die forgotten. Like our own ancestors and all the creatures (human and animal) on the planet before us. They seldom get photographed. So, it is nice to have some evidence of their existence, a way to keep them remembered.
Source of quote and photos: Todd Tripp
I went back to look for the feral colony today. They were not there, and their bag of food was not there. I’m hoping they got into homes.
I did see this fella I call “Old Man” elsewhere. I was worried about him last time I saw him, as that left eye was in pretty bad shape. He looks scarred there now; I’m guessing it’s a duelling scar.
He had company today in this little queen. And three kittens. One hid under wooden steps. Another kept to the side. A third looked sickly.
Is this wrong, taboo, or sinful?
I doubt the dog really sees much difference in posing nude – under a fur coat they’re all nude. But, the humans would know there’s something different about posing without clothing for a photograph with an animal. So, is this taking advantage of an animal? Is this taboo? Where are the lines drawn?
How would you feel if it were a child instead of a dog? What if the child were also nude? Yet, I don’t think it’s sinful for a parent to bathe their child and remove their own clothing to keep it from getting soaked.
There are so many interesting shades of grey.
This is an Original 1930s French erotic photo .
Source: Antique Original Nude Photo. Erotic phography by ParisBookandPaper
The little man is a turn on for me. Not being a midget, just little, tiny even. You can find a lot of macro fetish photos with giant women but what I like are tiny, little men. Tiny enough to fit into my pocket. So, this man love doll would be interesting but not small enough.
They say BIG things come in small packages and Midget Man is no exception. Just add air and this pint size party animal will pump up his pleasurepole and rock y
Source: Midget Man Love Doll | the naughty boutique
If this were racist or sexist how many people would be protesting? Yet, is it a problem really? “Persons with disabilities” have sex too. Persons without visible disabilities are recreated as sex dolls. All those social issues and do-gooding get confusing at times.
Found on Oddity Central.
I like to be contrary and think outside of the standard, accepted rules. Not that I don’t have firm beliefs but… how can things ever change if we are totally rigid and don’t even consider another perspective? At the end we still make our decisions but they can be based upon more than assumptions and snap judgments.
Where do you stand on animal or pet kissing? I’ve seen pet owners kiss their animals before. Not quite as well kissed as these illustrations but… is a kiss still a kiss or is a kiss even just a kiss?
If these illustrations creep you out think about why you don’t like them. The animals seem to be participating fully, not holding back or pulling away. Maybe the person smeared food on their lips? These are illustrations, not photographs. Illustrations are not actual images with actual people or animals. So rule that out of your thoughts in this case.
I don’t go around kissing animals at all. I don’t know where I would draw the line or judge someone else who does. But, I think it’s icky because of the bacteria and germ issue far more than anything sexual. I admit, I prefer a hug, a pat or a cuddle to kissing among myself and other humans. I don’t kiss babies, children or anyone I’m not really intimate with.
As far as the sexual thing… who can really speak for the animal and why do we draw lines never to be crossed for animals but allow children to be used and abused and sold? You may protest that it is not allowed. But, I think people have a much bigger reaction to sex with animals than they do to sex with children. To me, that is why I would not rush into decisions about bestiality, fetish or fantasy or criminal act? Our society allows some child porn. Look at some of the ads with children and think about it. Just a few years ago a diaper ad featured a baby being oogled because they looked good in their diaper. Sure it was all about fashion… sure it was….
Then there is the whole meat eating thing. If we are okay with cultivating animals in order to eat them… We say we believe everyone should be free to have sex in any style (with anyone and anything) they choose… I don’t think anyone really means it because any is a very big word, kind of like never and ever.
Yes, I’m being extreme and extremely liberal but… doesn’t it make you think?
Why is it ok for a dog to display it’s genitals but a human male in the same pose would be labeled as adult content, pornographic, shocking, disgusting, etc.? The image below was on Buzzfeed, a post about taking naps.
Not a sexual topic, not even about animals especially. It was just an image they used to illustrate taking a nap. The dog’s cock and balls are plainly visible, not blacked out or otherwise edited out. No warning about nudity for under age readers on the site. Weird really isn’t it?
I don’t think the photo was sexual or should have been edited out. The comparison just interests me. If a nude adult human male were posed the same way… it never would have been used, at all. Why is animal nudity ok but human nudity shocks us?
I’m surprised Discovery would create a show like this. Maybe it will turn out to be propaganda to sell a TV show. I hope so.
Curated from Discovery: Eaten Alive
I posted this tonight on the site for my town of Barrie, public suggestions. Pet people, before you rant off, this is not about your rights to have pets with you every hour of the day – this is about my right not to have your pets around me. I don’t see why I should tolerate your pets making me sick. Why can’t people just keep pets at home they way we used to do? Why do they need to carry animals (almost always dogs) around with them like a stuffed animal?
I do not dislike animals I just prefer them to be kept at an allergy and asthma free distance and not be a surprise I don’t want each time I go shopping, out for coffee, etc. If people can not leave pets at home then public places and stores can clearly let people know if they are safe for people or cater to pets.
Long ago, in the days of the Internet surfing highway, there was a purity test with over 1000 questions. I found a copy of it. Posted for your viewing (or take the test) pleasure.
THE UNISEX PURITY TEST
If you thought the millenial purity test was bad, well you ain’t see
This is the 1500 point Purity Test!
We felt that the 1000 point version lost a lot of the “fun” of the
earlier versions, so we re-wrote it, adding a few new sections, and
a shitload of questions. This test is guaranteed to be nosier that
your parents, more invasive than the census, and containing something
to offend everybody.
Also included is an answer form so that you can remember where in the
test you were, or show to a friend.
Continue reading Retro Internet: The 1500 Point Purity Test